Friday, June 7, 2019
Google in China Essay Example for Free
 Google in  china EssayIn 2006, China attempted to  kick the bucket away from socialism and declared itself committed to stinting reform and to opening itself to the outside world. Expanded personal freedoms for its citizens, however, China still maintained a  harsh enforcement of political and religious regulations ? Membership in the WTO put China back on the map as a possible mart for Western companies ? hick first American Internet company to enter China in 1999.Uncensored Internet information was not welcomed by Chinese authorities and  presidency  murdericials immediately  implement rules restricting access to content deemed improper or harmful, and monitored Internet usage of its citizens ? Included many private citizens in their surveillance efforts, and implemented public propaganda campaigns to create atmosphere of fear from reprisal and self-censorship ? Tom MacLean director of external Business for Google Inc.     or last nine months starting to worry about his  business    line security after a storm of criticism resulting from  last to agree to subject Googles search results to Chinese authority scrutiny ? Felt that he and his team had been mindful of political pitfalls they could face in implementing their strategic plan in China level and intensity of subsequent backlash and disapproval was  unthought-of ? Elliot Schrage, Googles vice president of Global Communications and Public Affairs, efended Googles censorship agreement as necessary, while at the same time admitting  decision conflicted deeply with Googles core principles, and that it was something they were not proud of ? Congressional hearing planted seeds of doubt in MacLean about Google in China decision. Starting to  challenge if Google was endorsing censorship by conforming to the Chinese authorities rules, if Google was acting as a tool for the  presidency, if Chinese citizens were actually better off after Googles decision to enter China, and whether censorship decision did go against    their stated corporate philosophy ?Top leadership claim Googles decision was made  base on information currently available at the time were not afraid to revisit that decision if necessary ? MacLean has only  peerless day  in front attending a meeting where he would be questioned on the development and implementation of Googles China strategy and asked for his suggestions for future courses of action ? MacLean under a lot of pressure to act, but his instinct is to stick by his strategy and let it play out a bit longer hoping that Senate hearing would be the last bit of publicity for a whileProblem Identification (Write in complete sentences from now on) Key  Identify major problem(s) and any  small(a) contributing problem(s) ? Googles launching of Google China and agreeing with Chinese governments censorship demands has tarnished their reputation and public image (major) ? Lots of bad publicity generated globally makes them look like hypocrites ? Caught  surrounded by alienation of    a potentially extremely lucrative  planetary market and an ethical dilemma of global proportion ? federation ridiculed for its professed dont be evil motto critics blame Google for supporting a country with a regime known for its numerous, fountainhead-documented abuses of human rights and oppressive measures  infraction of internationally recognized norms (minor) ? What should MacLean say at the meeting to justify his strategy? ? Has it become necessary for Googles top leadership team to revisit decision in light of new information and circumstances? What should we do? Under a lot of pressure to act. soon Inferences Key  Read between the lines and make some assumptions about the case that re suggested but not explicitly  domiciliated (read between the lines) ? Decision by Google to select China as its international target at this particular point in their political and social history is suspect, however, in accordance with their long-term global strategy, they could not pass up suc   h a tremendous opportunity ? Censorship decision was necessary to maintain their position as global search-engine market leaders and to fend off advances from major competitors such as Yahoo (who already have an established foothold in China) and Microsoft ?Capable of weathering out the storm of criticism without major  negative financial implications ? In time, entire episode will simply blow over as media moves on to something else ? For long-term gain, worth putting up with  short pain ? Actions can be justified if given the proper spin ? No irreparable damage has been done to the companys reputation ? International business risk associated with decision can be managed General Case Ideas Key  Link applicable course material/theory to the case  res publica applicable theory (the what) ? The global economy (Chapter 1, pages XX) Cultural influences on global business (Chapter 3, pages XX) ? Hofstedes Cultural Dimensions  Market Screening Process handouts ? Ethics and  incarnate Soci   al Responsibility in International Business handout ? Government and political influences on global business (Chapter 4, pages XX) ? Managing international business risk (Chapter 21, pages XX)  view relevant connections between course theory and the case (the so what) ? There are four major categories of the international business environment that MNCs should consider when deciding on potential expansion markets 1.Geographic Conditions (climate, terrain, seaways, natural resources) 2. Cultural  Social Factors (accepted behaviours, values, and customs language, education, religion, social  transactionhips) 3. Political and Legal Factors (type of government, political stability, government policies toward business) 4. Economic Conditions (type of economic  clay, general education level of the population, types of industries, level of technology) ? The two of these that are most applicable to this case are Cultural  Social FactorsThe more similar ones own culture is to another in histo   ry, language, religion etc. , the less difficult it is to conduct business in that society. But when societies differ on most of these characteristics, the potential for difficulty grows exponentially. For most American businesses in China, this potential is very high. There will be innumerable, unforeseen challenges, even when there is an  beneficial effort to learn about and understand China and its people. When doing business in China, many cultural and social considerations must be addressed.Political and Legal Factors China has been under the communist party rule for many decades. The communist party exercises absolute power over legislations and economic and cultural institutions. Unlike western economies where the government promotes transparency for doing business, in China rules and regulations are not so transparent. Strict laws and patents in economies of the west protect domestic and foreign businesses, whereas in China, the legal system is loosely defined, giving rise t   o various loopholes in the law.When doing business in China, many political and legal considerations must be considered. Conclusion and Recommendations Key   allude specific and implementable solutions to solve identified problems ? Maintain status quo regarding decision but go into damage control mode ? Hire an internationally-experienced and renowned public relations firm to present the situation in a more positive light (spin doctors) ? Counter bad publicity by using the media to your advantage. emersion a series of press releases arguing that it would be more damaging to pull out of China altogether address criticisms directly and clearly  rationalise the rationale of your decision ? Argue that censorship is necessary to keep the Chinese government from blocking Google altogether, and that Google can play a role more  reusable to the cause of free speech by participating in Chinas information technology  fabrication than by refusing to comply and being denied admission to the ma   inland Chinese market ? Highlight the fact that Chinese authorities have restricted citizens to opular search engines such as Altavista and Yahoo in the past, and that while removing search results is inconsistent with Googles mission, providing no information at all would be even more inconsistent with their mission ? More public visibility of Yahoo founders Page and Brin as well as CEO Eric Schmidt. Delivery of consistent message through carefully orchestrated television and print ad campaigns and appearances at national and international industry forums ? Alter public perception through increased promotion of Googles philanthropic work ?It is not Googles job to fix governments but to provide the best service to users and the best return possible to its stakeholders. By choosing to do business in China, it is their job to serve the Chinese people in their best, albeit restricted,  musical mode given current political climate ? If we didnt do it, someone else would have ? Emphasize    that censorship issues are not restricted to China and that Google also had to do similar things in Germany as well as in their own home country to meet legal requirements ?Stand together as an industry.  rent rivals assistance with similar issues and common interests. Get Bill Gates, billionaire founder of Microsoft, to stand up for arch-rival Google and argue that state censorship was no  apprehension for technology companies not to do business in China. Get Gates to issue public statement that the Internet is contributing to Chinese political engagement, as access to the outside world is preventing more censorship ? Close its China offices and abandon market  
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.